Effective+international+arrangements+to+assure+non-nuclear-weapon+States+against+the+use+or+threat+of+use+of+nuclear+weapons

The prevention of the possession of nuclear weaponry from states which are not authorized under UN jurisdiction has been a long standing issue in the UN, and here exist various inequalities between member nations in establishing a concrete action plan. the one argument that persists since the very introduction of the issue to the forum was the double standard wherein the victorious nations that emerged from the Second World War have the right to possession and use (if deemed necessary). Various action plans have been proposed and implemented, however nuclear "threat" from various nations is an issue that is not ignored. With the establishment of the NPT, the P5 members have aspired to acquire signatures from all member nations, and bring those volatile nations which are more prone to retaliation under the umbrella of the treaty. Two interesting cases are that of India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea; N. Korea was formerly a signatory nation of the NPT until it withdrew after a violation in 2003. The most relevant nations to Iraq concerning the proliferation of nuclear weaponry are Israel and Iran. There exists a lack of reciprocity in the constant highlights on Arab nations, while there exist various more pertinent examples to pursue and investigate. The most recent development was the friction placed against Iran to to allow NPT observers to access the nation's weapons arsenal, while right next door Israel is in possession of an already developed arsenal which it is willing to deploy against any aggressor as seen fit. This is the very essence of Iraq's concerns, and there should be a degree of equality in proposing investigations on nations for suspicions on possession.